News & Insights

< Back to Blogs

Reference Check Questions for Management Positions

February 14, 2019

Reference checking is an aspect of the hiring process that can often be overlooked or rushed, yet it is one of the most important steps that will ensure your new hire is a success. Plus, when it comes to recruiting for roles at a management or executive level – which can have a significant impact on the organisation – careful reference checking is even more essential. If you are carrying out your own reference checks, here are a few key considerations to keep in mind, as well as questions to ask when checking references.


Your Mindset


When hiring management-level technology professionals, it is important to take the time to understand your candidates’ careers in detail and evaluate their characteristics over an extended period. Senior candidates are often more comfortable when speaking in interviews; they have greater confidence in their abilities and can be highly persuasive. Similarly, it is easy to be swayed by candidates who have been endorsed by friends, colleagues or board members. This can lead to hasty decision making, increase the risk of making a bad hire and potentially result in negative impacts on the business.


Finding out whether a candidate is the right person for the role takes time, patience and diligence, and checking references is obviously a key part of the process. Our top tip when approaching this stage of the IT recruitment process is to go into reference checks with a view that you aren’t going to hire the candidate, and actively look for reasons not to employ them. This way, you will be able to identify negatives rather than just simply confirming your own positive thoughts. If their references aren’t what you had hoped, you’ll need to find other ways to probe further, or be prepared to remove a candidate from the shortlist entirely. However, if the referee sways your opinion in the candidate’s favour, it’s a good indicator that they may be a suitable hire.


Who Should be Contacted?


Traditionally, the candidate will volunteer the referees they have available to speak with, however, there is nothing wrong with requesting specific people you’d like to speak to.


As a rule of thumb, it’s worth getting a couple of different perspectives when carrying out reference checks for senior hires:


Direct Managers – It’s critical to request a reference from a direct manager, ideally from the candidate’s most recent role, or the previous one if necessary. This person will be able to provide the most detailed and up-to-date insights about the candidate’s track record.


Peers or Colleagues – Another option is to take a reference from a co-worker in a different department such as a Sales Manager, or someone else in the leadership team. These referees can shed some light on the candidate’s ability to engage or persuade stakeholders, as well as how they deal with in-house politics and other issues that arise from time to time.


Previous Employees – They will provide a view of the candidate’s leadership style and the way their existing team sees them as a manager.


Clients – If the candidate is in a client-facing role, past clients can offer additional insight into the candidate’s relationship-building and negotiation skills, and well as how they represent the company’s brand.

 

Asking Difficult Questions


Because of the magnitude of higher-level appointments, a detailed reference check can take up to 45 minutes to get a full download of information you need.


Here are some examples of effective questions to ask when checking references:

Personal attributes

  • How would you describe them overall? How would their team and peers describe them?
  • Tell me about their best personal qualities.

Are there any areas where they require further development or improvement?



Candidate track record

  • Over the course of their employment, what were their most significant achievements?
  • Have they been responsible for growth, and how did they contribute to achieving it?
  • Did they have any lasting effects on the company or staff?
  • What was the reason that they left your company?
  • Where do you think they will be in 5 years’ time?


Behavioural questions

  • Can you give an example of a time when they went above and beyond to ensure they achieved a good outcome?
  • How do they deal with stress, and have there been times where they couldn’t cope with a situation?
  • Describe how the candidate handles setbacks.
  • What is their approach to motivating their team?


Advice for future employers

  • Are there any aspects of this job you would alter to ensure it suits their abilities?
  • What is the best way to manage and bring out the best in them?
  • If given the opportunity, would you hire them again?
  • Is there anything else that you think we should know about them?


Closing Thoughts


A thorough and detailed reference check will ensure your new hire is a good fit for the business and prevent issues later down the line. To give yourself the best chance of success, don’t skip or rush the process and always trust your gut – if something doesn’t add up, there is probably a good reason behind it.


As experts in IT recruitment, we are always on hand to carry out extensive reference checks on your behalf. For further advice on checking references, or if you’d like support in hiring senior IT professionals, get in touch with the team at EITR.

Share This Article

Recent Articles

By Kara Porter June 22, 2025
Automated CV screening. Chatbot interviews. Interview scheduling bots. It’s no secret that tech is reshaping how we hire. In many ways, for the better. Speed, efficiency and cost control are all compelling reasons to automate. But while automation can solve for process, it can’t replace connection. Where Automation Adds Value Smart tech in the right places can remove friction and bias: CV screening tools that score against role criteria Automated interview scheduling that respects everyone’s time Chatbots that answer FAQs for candidates instantly Assessment platforms that test skills fairly. Used well, these tools enhance the hiring journey. Used poorly, they can feel like a wall, not a gateway. Where Experience Still Wins Candidates remember how you made them feel. No tech stack can: Explain what makes your culture different Read between the lines of a nervous candidate’s response Give personalised feedback or reassurance Advocate for someone who might be a wildcard but fits beautifully. How to Balance Both Automate admin, not empathy. Use tools to speed up logistics like interview booking or FAQs, but keep human contact for key interactions. Tell candidates what’s happening. Ghosting is often the result of automation without communication. Be transparent. Track candidate sentiment. Use surveys or NPS to measure how your process feels to candidates, not just how it performs. Train your people. A great recruiter using tech well is better than tech replacing recruiters. Make sure your teams know how to use the tools and build rapport. Personalise where it matters. A quick check-in call or tailored email can mean the difference between a disengaged candidate and a future advocate. 
By Kara Porter June 11, 2025
In enterprise IT, productivity isn’t just about technology or tools. It’s about people and how they work together. Yet, many organisations unknowingly suffer from a silent killer: misaligned roles and poor team dynamics that quietly zap efficiency, stall projects and drive up costs. What’s Causing This Productivity Drain? Rapid growth, shifting business priorities, and evolving technology landscapes can leave IT teams fragmented. Without strategic hiring and ongoing team calibration, roles overlap or leave critical gaps. Communication falters when technical experts and business stakeholders don’t share a clear vision or language. Over time, this erodes morale, increases turnover risk, and ultimately delays delivery. This can mean: Employees working in roles that don’t fully leverage their expertise Communication breakdowns between technical and business units Overlapping responsibilities or gaps in critical skills Reduced morale leading to higher turnover risk. The Cost of Ignoring Team Fit It’s easy to overlook how these issues impact bottom-line results: Delayed product launches and missed deadlines slow time-to-market and revenue growth. Hidden inefficiencies multiply as duplicated work or unresolved handoffs pile up. Increased employee churn creates continuous disruption and recruitment costs. Reduced innovation capacity limits your organisation’s ability to adapt to emerging challenges. However, there is a solution: targeted recruitment. Effective IT recruitment goes beyond filling seats. It focuses on: Understanding organisational goals and culture Assessing candidates’ technical skills alongside interpersonal and leadership abilities Building complementary teams with diverse, balanced skill sets Enabling collaboration between IT and business stakeholders. How Strategic Recruitment Solves the Problem The solution goes beyond sourcing technical skills. It requires a holistic approach that: Aligns hiring to your business roadmap and strategic objectives. Prioritises candidates’ ability to collaborate, communicate and lead within your unique culture. Builds balanced teams that complement strengths and fill gaps, enhancing overall capability. Facilitates ongoing evaluation to recalibrate team structures as needs evolve. Building Teams That Deliver Outcomes When recruitment focuses on fit and alignment, IT teams become more than just a collection of skills — they become engines of business value. High-performing teams accelerate project delivery, foster innovation, and improve resilience against disruption. Partnering for Success Enterprise IT Recruitment works closely with organisations to develop targeted talent strategies that address these challenges head-on. Is your IT team structured to deliver peak productivity? If not, it’s time to rethink your recruitment strategy before the silent killer stalls your growth. We're here to help - get in touch here .
Tips to balance speed and quality in tech hiring
By Kara Porter April 29, 2025
Speed and quality are often viewed as competing priorities when hiring in the tech market. Hiring managers and talent teams face ongoing pressure to fill roles quickly, especially in candidate-short markets. However, bringing in the wrong hire can cost dearly in productivity, morale and retention. So, how can businesses scale teams rapidly without sacrificing quality? Is it possible to have both speed and quality in tech hiring? We think so—and here’s how. Why the trade-off exists The tension between speed and quality usually stems from a lack of clarity or preparation. Rushed processes often skip essential steps like cultural alignment, technical testing or stakeholder buy-in. On the flip side, overly meticulous processes risk losing top talent to faster-moving competitors. The sweet spot lies in structure, communication, and smart tooling. The cost of getting it wrong Hiring too fast, without due diligence, can lead to: Poor team fit and early attrition Productivity loss due to underperformance Reputational damage, especially in tight-knit tech communities. Meanwhile, moving too slow can result in: Lost candidates to faster companies Prolonged project delays Burnout among existing team members carrying the extra load. Strategies for speed and quality Define success up front Get clear on the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves for each role. Involve both technical leads and cultural stakeholders early. A well-aligned brief means faster shortlisting and better screening. Use pre-qualified talent pools Work with a recruitment partner that specialises in tech and already has deep, pre-screened networks. This cuts sourcing time and improves candidate experience from the start. Implement structured interviewing Use consistent questions and scoring frameworks across candidates. It removes bias, saves time and enables faster comparisons. Tech-enable your process Leverage tools like automated scheduling, coding platforms and AI-powered CV screening to reduce manual work without compromising assessment depth. Communicate with intent Regular feedback loops between hiring managers, HR and external partners speed up decision-making. Candidates also stay engaged when communication is proactive and transparent. Set SLA benchmarks Create internal SLAs for each stage of the hiring process. For example, resume review within 48 hours, interviews booked within 3 days, and feedback within 24 hours. These benchmarks help maintain velocity without losing quality. Pilot and iterate If your current hiring approach isn’t working, test new workflows. For example, trial a pre-interview technical screen instead of a live coding test. Track success rates and time-to-hire data to inform improvements. The Bottom Line Speed and quality don’t have to be mutually exclusive. With the right structure, clear expectations, and smart use of tools and talent partners, you can build a hiring engine that delivers both.

Filter By Category

Subscribe to our News & Advice

By Kara Porter June 22, 2025
Automated CV screening. Chatbot interviews. Interview scheduling bots. It’s no secret that tech is reshaping how we hire. In many ways, for the better. Speed, efficiency and cost control are all compelling reasons to automate. But while automation can solve for process, it can’t replace connection. Where Automation Adds Value Smart tech in the right places can remove friction and bias: CV screening tools that score against role criteria Automated interview scheduling that respects everyone’s time Chatbots that answer FAQs for candidates instantly Assessment platforms that test skills fairly. Used well, these tools enhance the hiring journey. Used poorly, they can feel like a wall, not a gateway. Where Experience Still Wins Candidates remember how you made them feel. No tech stack can: Explain what makes your culture different Read between the lines of a nervous candidate’s response Give personalised feedback or reassurance Advocate for someone who might be a wildcard but fits beautifully. How to Balance Both Automate admin, not empathy. Use tools to speed up logistics like interview booking or FAQs, but keep human contact for key interactions. Tell candidates what’s happening. Ghosting is often the result of automation without communication. Be transparent. Track candidate sentiment. Use surveys or NPS to measure how your process feels to candidates, not just how it performs. Train your people. A great recruiter using tech well is better than tech replacing recruiters. Make sure your teams know how to use the tools and build rapport. Personalise where it matters. A quick check-in call or tailored email can mean the difference between a disengaged candidate and a future advocate. 
By Kara Porter June 11, 2025
In enterprise IT, productivity isn’t just about technology or tools. It’s about people and how they work together. Yet, many organisations unknowingly suffer from a silent killer: misaligned roles and poor team dynamics that quietly zap efficiency, stall projects and drive up costs. What’s Causing This Productivity Drain? Rapid growth, shifting business priorities, and evolving technology landscapes can leave IT teams fragmented. Without strategic hiring and ongoing team calibration, roles overlap or leave critical gaps. Communication falters when technical experts and business stakeholders don’t share a clear vision or language. Over time, this erodes morale, increases turnover risk, and ultimately delays delivery. This can mean: Employees working in roles that don’t fully leverage their expertise Communication breakdowns between technical and business units Overlapping responsibilities or gaps in critical skills Reduced morale leading to higher turnover risk. The Cost of Ignoring Team Fit It’s easy to overlook how these issues impact bottom-line results: Delayed product launches and missed deadlines slow time-to-market and revenue growth. Hidden inefficiencies multiply as duplicated work or unresolved handoffs pile up. Increased employee churn creates continuous disruption and recruitment costs. Reduced innovation capacity limits your organisation’s ability to adapt to emerging challenges. However, there is a solution: targeted recruitment. Effective IT recruitment goes beyond filling seats. It focuses on: Understanding organisational goals and culture Assessing candidates’ technical skills alongside interpersonal and leadership abilities Building complementary teams with diverse, balanced skill sets Enabling collaboration between IT and business stakeholders. How Strategic Recruitment Solves the Problem The solution goes beyond sourcing technical skills. It requires a holistic approach that: Aligns hiring to your business roadmap and strategic objectives. Prioritises candidates’ ability to collaborate, communicate and lead within your unique culture. Builds balanced teams that complement strengths and fill gaps, enhancing overall capability. Facilitates ongoing evaluation to recalibrate team structures as needs evolve. Building Teams That Deliver Outcomes When recruitment focuses on fit and alignment, IT teams become more than just a collection of skills — they become engines of business value. High-performing teams accelerate project delivery, foster innovation, and improve resilience against disruption. Partnering for Success Enterprise IT Recruitment works closely with organisations to develop targeted talent strategies that address these challenges head-on. Is your IT team structured to deliver peak productivity? If not, it’s time to rethink your recruitment strategy before the silent killer stalls your growth. We're here to help - get in touch here .
Tips to balance speed and quality in tech hiring
By Kara Porter April 29, 2025
Speed and quality are often viewed as competing priorities when hiring in the tech market. Hiring managers and talent teams face ongoing pressure to fill roles quickly, especially in candidate-short markets. However, bringing in the wrong hire can cost dearly in productivity, morale and retention. So, how can businesses scale teams rapidly without sacrificing quality? Is it possible to have both speed and quality in tech hiring? We think so—and here’s how. Why the trade-off exists The tension between speed and quality usually stems from a lack of clarity or preparation. Rushed processes often skip essential steps like cultural alignment, technical testing or stakeholder buy-in. On the flip side, overly meticulous processes risk losing top talent to faster-moving competitors. The sweet spot lies in structure, communication, and smart tooling. The cost of getting it wrong Hiring too fast, without due diligence, can lead to: Poor team fit and early attrition Productivity loss due to underperformance Reputational damage, especially in tight-knit tech communities. Meanwhile, moving too slow can result in: Lost candidates to faster companies Prolonged project delays Burnout among existing team members carrying the extra load. Strategies for speed and quality Define success up front Get clear on the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves for each role. Involve both technical leads and cultural stakeholders early. A well-aligned brief means faster shortlisting and better screening. Use pre-qualified talent pools Work with a recruitment partner that specialises in tech and already has deep, pre-screened networks. This cuts sourcing time and improves candidate experience from the start. Implement structured interviewing Use consistent questions and scoring frameworks across candidates. It removes bias, saves time and enables faster comparisons. Tech-enable your process Leverage tools like automated scheduling, coding platforms and AI-powered CV screening to reduce manual work without compromising assessment depth. Communicate with intent Regular feedback loops between hiring managers, HR and external partners speed up decision-making. Candidates also stay engaged when communication is proactive and transparent. Set SLA benchmarks Create internal SLAs for each stage of the hiring process. For example, resume review within 48 hours, interviews booked within 3 days, and feedback within 24 hours. These benchmarks help maintain velocity without losing quality. Pilot and iterate If your current hiring approach isn’t working, test new workflows. For example, trial a pre-interview technical screen instead of a live coding test. Track success rates and time-to-hire data to inform improvements. The Bottom Line Speed and quality don’t have to be mutually exclusive. With the right structure, clear expectations, and smart use of tools and talent partners, you can build a hiring engine that delivers both.
What the new gender equality legislation means for employers
By Kara Porter March 31, 2025
On March 27, 2025, the Federal Parliament passed new legislation that will reshape how large employers in Australia approach workplace gender equality. Under the reforms, businesses with 500 or more employees will now be required to: Set three gender equality targets, with at least one being numeric; Demonstrate progress toward these targets within three years; Continue reporting annually to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA). This is a milestone moment in a play to shift the Australian workplace culture. It reflects a growing push for accountability, transparency and meaningful change in the workplace. So, what does this mean for employers? Targets Must Be Tangible A vague commitment to “improving gender diversity” won’t cut it. Employers will need to back up their intentions with measurable goals - such as increasing women in leadership, closing pay gaps, or improving retention in underrepresented groups. Data-Driven Decisions Will Lead the Way To set realistic, evidence-based targets, companies will need to dive deep into their workforce data. Understanding where the gaps are - whether it’s in hiring, promotion pathways, or pay equity - is step one. Policies, Processes & People It’s also a nudge to reassess internal practices. Are your recruitment and promotion processes inclusive? Are flexible work arrangements available (and used) equitably? Is your leadership team actively invested in supporting diversity outcomes? Accountability Goes Public WGEA will continue to publish pay gap data—and now, target progress too. That means internal efforts will be visible externally, and employers leading the way will build stronger reputations as equitable, forward-thinking workplaces. Why it matters to us at EITR At EITR , we work with businesses undergoing transformation - and the best transformations start from within. Hiring diverse, high-performing teams isn’t just a compliance box to tick—it’s how companies thrive. This legislation reflects a shared responsibility to build workplaces where talent can grow and succeed, regardless of gender. Whether you're a business navigating these new expectations or a candidate seeking an inclusive environment where your career can flourish - we’re here to support you.  🔗 Want to know more about how we help organisations build diverse, future-ready teams? Get in touch with us here .
By Sarah McCandless March 7, 2025
For years, companies have been locked in a battle to attract the best candidates - offering higher salaries, bigger perks, and more benefits in the hopes of outbidding their competitors. But in 2025, the conversation is shifting. The companies winning today aren’t necessarily the ones offering the biggest paychecks; they’re the ones adapting to how work is changing. The talent war isn’t about hiring faster or throwing more money at the problem anymore - it’s about rethinking how we build workforces altogether. So, how are leading organisations shifting their approach? They’re moving beyond outdated recruitment battles and focusing on internal mobility, skills development, flexible work models, and alternative hiring pipelines. Why the Talent War No Longer Works The idea of a "talent war" assumes that there’s a fixed number of high-performing professionals, and companies must compete to secure them. But this approach has a few major flaws: It’s expensive - Constantly outbidding competitors for the same people isn’t sustainable. It’s short-sighted - Hiring externally without investing in existing employees leads to retention issues. It ignores hidden talent - Many businesses overlook high-potential candidates who may not fit a traditional mold but have the skills and adaptability to thrive. With unemployment rates remaining low and skills shortages persisting in industries like technology, cybersecurity, and engineering, businesses must stop seeing hiring as a competition and start treating it as a strategic transformation. The Talent Shift... What’s Changing? Instead of treating hiring as a race for the same candidates, leading companies are making three key shifts: 1. Internal Mobility: Investing in the People You Already Have Companies are realising that the best candidate for the job might already be within their organisation. Instead of constantly hiring externally, businesses are focusing on upskilling, cross-training, and internal promotions. 📌 Example: Atlassian has developed structured career pathways that help employees transition into new roles without leaving the company, reducing external hiring needs. 2. Skills Over Job Titles More companies are moving toward skills-based hiring, recognising that traditional job titles and degree requirements can exclude high-potential candidates. Rather than asking, “Who has a degree in computer science and five years of experience?” companies are now asking, “Who has the problem-solving and coding skills to excel in this role?” 📌 Example: Telstra has introduced skills-based hiring initiatives, allowing candidates from non-traditional backgrounds to break into tech roles based on their capabilities, not just their CVs. 3. Alternative Hiring Pipelines Companies are expanding their candidate pools by looking beyond the usual recruitment channels. This includes: Partnering with universities and bootcamps Offering return-to-work programs for career changers Creating more entry-level pathways and apprenticeships 📌 Example: The Victorian Government’s Digital Jobs Program is helping mid-career professionals transition into the tech industry through funded training and job placements. The Future of Work is Built - Not Bought Companies that succeed in 2025 and beyond will be the ones that build their talent, not just buy it. By moving away from outdated hiring models and focusing on development, flexibility, and inclusivity, organisations can create workforces that aren’t just competitive - but sustainable. The talent war may be over, but the companies that adapt to this new reality will be the ones leading the next decade of innovation.
By Shazamme System User February 10, 2025
In 2025, the ability to balance technical proficiency with human-centric qualities like adaptability, creativity, and emotional intelligence will define the leaders in tech hiring.
By Sarah McCandless January 2, 2025
The most sought-after tech professionals aren’t just looking for work - they’re looking for alignment. They want to see companies with a clear purpose, genuine values, and a willingness to invest in people as much as products.
By Sarah McCandless December 4, 2024
So, what will the workforce of 2025 look like, and how can businesses prepare for the changes ahead? Let’s explore the key trends and actionable strategies.
By Sarah McCandless November 14, 2024
Whether you run a small business or a large enterprise, strong cybersecurity practices are essential to protecting your organisation from potentially devastating breaches. However, you don’t always need expensive technology or an army of security experts to keep your business safe. Sometimes, good cyber hygiene - simple, everyday practices - can make all the difference in maintaining security.
Upskilling and Reskilling
By Sarah McCandless September 2, 2024
For businesses to stay competitive, and for employees to remain relevant, continuous learning through upskilling and reskilling is a non-negotiable.
More Posts